Acknowledging Australia’s fire protection industry this World Environment Day
Every year on 5 June, World Environment Day encourages people and businesses to take action for the environment. It’s a day to think about how we can take better care of our planet, and the fire protection industry is doing its part in Australia.
Many scheduled extinguishing agents use chemicals called HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons). HFCs don’t damage the ozone layer, but they are powerful greenhouse gases. If they leak into the atmosphere, they make climate change worse.
Australia is working to use fewer and fewer HFCs over time. This is part of a global agreement called the Kigali Amendment under the Montreal Protocol. Australia started this program in 2005, with a phase-out of HFCs introduced in 2018. At the time of the phase-down commencement, the country was allowed to import 8 million tonnes of HFCs per year (measured in how much they’d heat the planet, compared to CO₂). By 2036, that limit drops to just 1.6 million tonnes, an 85% reduction. This is predicted to prevent up to 23 million tonnes of CO₂ equivalent being released into the atmosphere.
This work builds on earlier environmental successes. Australia has already phased out most ozone-depleting substances, including chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs). According to the Department of Climate Change, Environment and Water (DCEEW) as a result of this work, Australia’s emissions from these substances fell from 56 million tonnes of CO₂-e in 1995 to 10 million tonnes in 2012. Substantial reductions like this demonstrates the effectiveness of the industry’s collective action with greater inroads made since then.
In response to this, more and more companies are switching to more cleaner alternatives where possible. The fire protection industry can further contribute to this effective work by handling scheduled extinguishing agents safely and upholding best practice, holding the correct permit, reducing the chance of accidental discharge.
So this World Environment Day, it’s worth recognising that even industries you might not think about, like fire protection, are making real effective changes to help protect the environment.
maybe add in how HFCs were added in 2018 – the program started in 2005
Starting a Career in Gaseous Fire Protection: Understanding trainee licences as both an employee and employer
Starting a career in the fire protection industry can open the door to a rewarding and highly skilled profession. For many new technicians, one of the first steps is understanding the licensing requirements for handling scheduled extinguishing agents.
A scheduled extinguishing agent is a form of gas used in fire suppression systems, that contain either Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) or Synthetic Greenhouse Gases (SGGs). Common agents found across the industry include FM-200, NAF-S-III, NAF-P-III and in some industries halon. Anyone who works with these agents will be required by law to hold what is called an Extinguishing Agent Handling Licence.
If you are entering the industry for the first time and intend on working with scheduled extinguishing agents, you may not yet have the experience needed to apply for a qualified or experienced EAHL. In these situations, a trainee licence is required before undertaking this type of work.
A trainee licence allows new workers to gain practical experience while working under close supervision. This helps ensure work involving scheduled extinguishing agents is carried out safely and in line with the Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Act 1989 (the Act) and the Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Regulations (the Regulations). It also gives trainees the opportunity to build confidence, develop technical skills and gain experience in real workplace settings.
Supervision is an important part of the training process. Supervisors must already hold the correct licence for the work being carried out and are responsible for guiding trainees through safe handling of scheduled extinguishing agent practices. Businesses and supervisors should also ensure that all trainees hold a current trainee licence before starting work. Providing the right level of support and oversight helps ensure safer use of scheduled extinguishing agents, best practice and reduces the risks of a preventable discharge of scheduled agent, It is incumbent on the employer or supervisor to ensure that they also hold the correct permit and entitlements to work with trainees.
Training is a key part of the licensing pathway. Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) offer the units of competency required when applying for a licence. Depending on the provider, training may be delivered face-to-face, online or through a combination of both. New workers are encouraged to speak with training providers about delivery options and course requirements before enrolling.
The Fire Protection Industry Board (FPIB) also encourages trainees and employers to share feedback about training experiences. Feedback helps the Board better understand industry needs and identify any issues affecting training quality or accessibility.
Ultimately, for those beginning their career in gaseous fire protection and who will handle scheduled extinguishing agents, understanding licensing requirements early can help build a strong foundation for a safe and successful career. To apply for a trainee licence, click here.
Understanding Permit Entitlements: A common non-compliance issue identified through field engagement:
Working outside the scope of a permit remains the most common area of non-compliance identified through the Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board’s (FPIB) Field Engagement Program. Since July 2025, the Board has recorded 18 instances of non-compliant work, with more than half involving technicians undertaking work outside their entitlement type.
In many cases, permit holders were unaware that additional entitlements were required to complete certain tasks. A common example involves EAHL Experience 6 permit holders mechanically removing actuators while carrying out AS 1851 testing. While these technicians may be authorised to conduct testing activities, the removal of an actuator requires an EAHL 2 or 3 entitlement.
The findings highlight the importance of understanding exactly what work each entitlement allows. Undertaking work outside a permit category can place technicians, businesses and clients at risk, and may also result in regulatory action.
The Field Engagement Program also identified other areas of non-compliance, including overdue quarterly usage reports for Extinguishing Agent Trading Authorisation (EATA) and Halon Special Permit (HSP) holders, as well as issues relating to Risk Management Plans. These issues commonly occur when reminders are missed or employee details are not updated after staff changes. In most cases the matters were resolved quickly following engagement with the Board.
Permit holders are encouraged to regularly review their licence categories, ensure permits remain current and contact the Board if they are unsure whether additional entitlements are required for a task.
Career Pathways in the Fire Protection Industry: Elvira Nigido on Women’s Participation in the Permit Scheme
For more than three decades, Elvira Nigido has worked to promote and enhance the positive impacts from responsible life cycle management of various environmentally harmful fire extinguishing agents and refrigerants controlled by the Montreal Protocol in Australia and abroad. This experience spans the early days of supporting the establishment and operation of Australia’s National Halon Bank through to current global sustainability responsibilities for A-Gas International, including advocacy on the importance of life cycle management to close crticial gaps presented by the Montreal Protocol. As an Extinguishing Agent Handling Licence (EAHL) holder since the scheme’s inception, her experience offers valuable insight into how professional standards support long-term career development and how visibility of experienced practitioners can help broaden understanding of career pathways across the industry.
Nigido began her career in the early 1990’s joining the National Halon Bank program after completing her environmental science degree. At the time and several years after signing the Montreal Protocol the Commonwealth Government committed resources to establish the Australian National Halon Bank for the safe collection and storage of surplus halon in Australia.
“I started when all that, was being established and developed,” she recalls. “So very early in the program’s infancy I saw the National Halon Bank being built from scratch.” Working at the foundation of Australia’s approach to managing Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) and later Synthetic Greenhouse Gases (SGGs) in fire protection and refrigeration, has provided her with a strong understanding of both public and private sector frameworks and collaborations designed to fulfill Australia’s obligations under the domestic ozone regulations and the Montreal Protocol. To leverage off her industry experience and familiaty with the permit scheme, she was appointed in 2016 to the Australian Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board.
As programs evolved and priorities shifted, so too did Nigido’s career. Today, at A-GAS International, she is responsible for leading and delivering sustainability initiatives and compliance, including measuring emissions from refrigerants and fire protection gases across A-Gas global operations. She is the Australian representative on the United Nations Fire Suppression Technical Options Committee which supports the Parties to the Montreal Protocol, contributing to technical reports that inform international policy and decision-making. Her progression from national program delivery to global technical engagement demonstrates how best practice developed through the permit scheme can support careers that extend well beyond Australia.
As an EAHL permit holder and since the early days of the scheme, Nigido also contributed to the scheme’s development, including reviewing competencies and supporting the production of training workbooks. The licensing framework, she says, has played a critical role in maintaining professionalism across the fire protection industry.
“These things help the industry,” she explains. “They keep people competant, keep harmful emissions out of the atmosphere and businesses compliant and accountable.” Over time, her detailed understanding of the permit scheme has proven invaluable in supporting both individual careers and broader industry integrity and professional standards. .
While acknowledging that progress has been made, Nigido notes the industry continues to evolve in terms of representation. For her, creating a more diverse workforce starts with awareness and access to information about the breadth of roles available within the fire protection industry.
“If you don’t have exposure, you don’t know what you don’t know,” she explains. “You might have a really bright spark, female or male, that would have a lot to offer. But if they don’t know what’s involved and the breadth of opportunity, it’s potentially a missed opportunity.” Exposure needs to start during career planning at the end of secondary school and going into tertiary eduction.
For women already working in the sector, she highlights the importance of active support and development pathways across a range of roles, from technical and engineering positions through to marketing and business functions. “Making sure that the employer gives them that development opportunity and that pathway to expand,” she says.
Nigido also emphasises the role of mentoring, coaching and early engagement with schools and universities in strengthening the future workforce. “It’s not just about fire protection,” she stresses. “This industry can provide so much opportunity and allow people to really harness their skill set.” Increasing awareness of these opportunities, she believes, benefits the industry as a whole by helping attract and retain skilled people with diverse capabilities.
Her advice to women considering a career in fire protection is practical and grounded in experience. “Persist, persist, persist, don’t feel discouraged, take risks, make mistakes as each one teaches us something valuable.” She acknowledges that technical fields can be challenging but encourages treating setbacks as opportunities to learn and build capability.
“Look for coaches, look for mentors, role models, look for networks that will give you more exposure and help build your skill set,” she advises. “And if you’re in a technical role, keep up with what’s going on because technology and standards continuously evolve and change.” Above all, she encourages asking questions and remaining curious.
What ultimately makes Nigido’s work most rewarding is the great people from all works of life she’s had the pleasure to engage with over the years and the sense of purpose she’s found in her roles. “I’ve been fortunate that I’ve had a purpose. And it also aligns with my personal values around the environment and leaving a positive legacy.” Her three-decade journey, spanning from the National Halon Bank to global sustainability leadership, demonstrates how professional standards, combined with experience, mentorship and opportunity, can support meaningful and enduring careers in the fire protection industry.
Leading the shift to cleaner fire protection
How Wormald is supporting transitions away from Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) and Synthetic Greenhouse Gases (SGGs)
Wormald was awarded the Outstanding Ozone Practice Award at Fire Australia 2025 in recognition of its work supporting clients to transition away from Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) and Synthetic Greenhouse Gases (SGGs) used in fire suppression systems. This work reflects the growing need for organisations to respond to tightening environmental requirements, Australia’s obligations under the Montreal Protocol and its associated domestic legislation.
Across sectors such as energy and defence, Wormald has worked with asset owners to replace legacy fire suppression agents that are now subject to phasedown measures. These transitions require detailed engineering assessment and careful planning to ensure fire protection performance is maintained while environmental risks are reduced.
Two recent projects demonstrate how this approach has been applied in very different operational environments.
Replacing HCFC-based systems in critical energy infrastructure: Epic Energy compressor station, South Australia:
Epic Energy operates a network of natural gas transmission assets across South Australia, including compressor stations protected by fixed fire suppression systems. Historically, some of these facilities were fitted with NAFSIII, a halon replacement agent containing HFC-123, a controlled substance with Ozone Depleting Potential (ODP) and a high Global Warming Potential (GWP).
As environmental controls have tightened and Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFC) based agents have become more restricted, Epic Energy initiated a program to replace legacy NAFS-III systems with compliant alternatives to address long-term environmental and operational risks.
“At sites like Epic Energy’s compressor stations, the driver to move away from HCFC-based agents was clear, ongoing compliance, availability of agent and long-term operational risk,” says Justin Morris, Technical Manager at Wormald.
Working with Epic Energy, Wormald supported the replacement of NAFSIII with Inerex IG-541, an inert gas fire suppression agent composed of naturally occurring atmospheric gases. The system has zero Ozone Depleting Potential (ODP) and zero Global Warming Potential and is compliant with Australian environmental legislation.
“Replacing NAFSIII with an inert gas system allowed the site to completely eliminate ozone depleting and high-GWP substances while maintaining protection for critical equipment,” Justin says.
The project required a detailed engineering review, including reassessment of cylinder storage, pipework sizing, discharge calculations and venting requirements. Room integrity testing and commissioning were completed to confirm system performance in accordance with relevant Australian Standards.
The legacy NAFSIII agent was safely recovered by licensed contractors and transferred to the National Halon Bank for disposal, removing the need for future permits and restrictions associated with HCFC-based systems.
Transitioning away from HFCs in Defence marine environments: Paluma-class vessels, Royal Australian Navy
The Royal Australian Navy’s Paluma-class hydrographic survey vessels were originally fitted with FM-200 (HFC-227ea) fire suppression systems in their engine rooms. At the time of installation, FM-200 provided an effective clean agent solution for marine applications.
Over time, increasing controls on high global warming potential hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), including Australia’s obligations under the Kigali Amendment, created a clear need to reduce reliance on FM-200 across Defence platforms.
“FM-200 was effective when it was installed, but its high global warming potential (GWP) and phasedown controls created a clear need for change,” Justin says.
Working alongside Defence engineering teams, Wormald supported the replacement of FM-200 with Inergen (IG-541), an inert gas fire suppression system with zero GWP and no ODP. The solution was selected based on its suitability for occupied spaces and compatibility with marine operating environments.
“For Defence platforms, the challenge is achieving environmental compliance without compromising crew safety or operational capability,” Justin explains.
Detailed engineering assessments were undertaken to confirm cylinder storage requirements, venting and pressure relief needs, system integration and impacts on vessel layout. Installation was aligned with scheduled maintenance periods to minimise operational disruption, followed by full functional testing and certification to relevant marine and Defence standards.
Following the transition, the removal of the HFC-based agent eliminated future exposure to agent scarcity, rising lifecycle costs and environmental penalties associated with discharge.
“Once the HFC-based agent was removed, the risk of future levies, supply constraints and environmental penalties was eliminated,” Justin says.
Across both projects, early planning and detailed engineering were critical to achieving compliant outcomes. Inert gas systems rely heavily on enclosure performance, venting and pressure management, making upfront assessment essential when replacing legacy agents.
“Early planning is critical when replacing legacy agents, particularly where inert gas systems rely on room integrity and venting performance,” Justin notes.
Together, these projects demonstrate how transitions away from Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) and Synthetic Greenhouse Gases (SGGs) can be achieved across very different operating environments while maintaining required fire protection performance and meeting evolving environmental obligations.
Have you or your company been working with cleaner alternatives and leading the transition away from ODS & SGG fire suppression systems? You should consider nominating for the 2026 Outstanding Ozone Practice Award here.
Wormald Australia leads the way in transitioning to cleaner fire suppression alternatives
At the Fire Australia 2025 Conference and Awards, Wormald Australia was recognised for its leadership and innovation in environmental stewardship, receiving the Outstanding Ozone Practice Award from the Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board. This award is designed to acknowledge the efforts of business and individuals within the fire protection industry leading the way in the change to cleaner alternatives.
With 135 years of experience in fire safety, Wormald maintains and services numerous gaseous fire extinguishing agent systems across the country, supported by more than 200 technicians who hold Extinguishing Agent Handling Licences (EAHL).
Wormald has demonstrated a long-term commitment to transitioning away from ozone-depleting substances (ODS) and synthetic greenhouse gases (SGG) toward more sustainable alternatives. “Wormald introduced Inergen® into the market in the early 1990s,” the company’s National Learning & Development Manager, Rod Rolfe explains. “Where a halocarbon gaseous agent is required by a client, we now recommend FK-5-1-12, which currently has the lowest environmental impact among available halocarbon agents.”
Wormald played a pivotal role in developing Inergen®, a breathable and environmentally friendly fire suppression system designed for use in enclosed spaces. The introduction of the 150 bar Inergen® system in October 1993 marked a significant milestone, providing the industry with a viable alternative to halon-based agents while maintaining occupant safety and minimising environmental impact.
The company’s innovation journey began when Halon 1301 was banned in the early 1990s. In response, Wormald introduced NAF-S-III as an early replacement, followed by FM200, before moving toward greener inert gas systems and alternative technologies such as Water Mist and Aerosols. “Inerex 300bar, introduced in 2017, is another example of our commitment to evolving toward safer, more sustainable suppression solutions,” Rod notes.
A major initiative in Wormald’s environmental strategy is its client conversion program, which supports the gradual phase-out of scheduled extinguishing agents. As Rod explains:
“As a major initiative to move away from the use of scheduled agents, Wormald, when undertaking the ten-yearly routine service, offers our clients a proposal for changing their existing system to a more environmentally friendly alternative. This helps minimise changeover costs in the future and provides an environmental initiative for our clients and their business.”
To embed this commitment across its operations, Wormald’s technical department has communicated clear procedures to all branches; for all new installations, inert gaseous agents or fourth-generation chemical agents that are not listed as scheduled substances are to be recommended; for existing systems, clients are encouraged to convert when their systems reach the ten-year pressure test requirement.
This proactive approach has achieved significant success in decommissioning older systems containing ODS and SGG agents, reducing potential emissions and strengthening Australia’s contribution to ozone layer recovery.
“Wormald’s commitment to competency and engineering excellence in handling ODS and SGG agents is recognised Australia-wide,” Rod said. “Our rigorous training, quality assurance, and client conversion strategies continue to support a more sustainable fire protection industry.”
Beyond its adoption of cleaner agents, Wormald has set a strong example through its training, quality control, and system conversion initiatives. All technicians who handle scheduled gases are trained internally through Wormald’s Registered Training Organisation (RTO), to ensure competence and adherence to best practice standards. “The implementation of our thorough education and training practices minimises accidental discharge of ODS and SGG agents into the environment, further helping to heal the ozone layer,” Rod said.
The Fire Protection Industry (ODS&SGG) Board congratulates Wormald on its continued leadership and commitment to innovation, environmental responsibility, and best practice in the handling and phase-out of scheduled extinguishing agents.
Have you or your company been working with cleaner alternatives and leading the transition away from ODS & SGG fire suppression systems? You should consider nominating for the 2026 Outstanding Ozone Practice Award here.
Why Reporting Discharges Matters for the Fire Protection Industry and the Environment
Across Australia, discharges of scheduled extinguishing agents continue to occur across a number of different industries. While many discharges are necesssary to put out fires. most are preventable and are related to human error. No matter the reason for a discharge, reporting these to the Board is essential to understanding incidents and improving how risks are managed across industry.
Recent data provides a useful snapshot of reported discharges across industry and highlights where risks may be more prevalent.
From 1 February 2025 to 28 February 2026, a total of 49 discharges were reported. The distribution of reported discharges across sectors reflects the different environments and the operating conditions in which scheduled extinguishing agents and the technicians servicing them are working in.
For the 2025–26 period:
- Mining recorded 22 reported discharges
- Defence (contractors) recorded 8
- Building and marine sectors each recorded 5
- Aviation recorded 5 (2025 only)
- Utilities and destruction each recorded 1
While these figures reflect reported incidents only, they help build a clearer picture of where and how discharges are occurring, and where greater awareness and preventative focus may be beneficial.
Why reporting matters:
Reporting a discharge plays an important role in improving how risks are understood and managed across the industry. It also helps the Board understand how it can better educate and support industry from preventing avoidable, human-error related discharges.
Each report contributes to:
- Identifying common causes and system issues
- Informing guidance, training, and communication
- Highlighting risks in specific environments
- Supporting a more accurate understanding of industry activity
Without reporting, these insights are limited. Incidents may be repeated, and opportunities to better support best practices across the fire protection industry can be missed.
Tracking environmental impact:
Reporting discharges also plays an important role in tracking emissions of Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) and Synthetic Greenhouse Gases (SGGs), from an environmental perspective.
Accurate reporting helps build a clearer picture of how much gas is being released, where emissions are occurring, and whether trends are changing over time. This information helps support Australia meet its national reporting obligations under the Montreal Protocol and Kigali Amendment.
Without consistent reporting, it becomes more difficult to understand the full environmental impact of discharges or measure progress in reducing them.
Preventing accidental discharges
Reducing the likelihood of a discharge starts with practical controls applied consistently on site. There are a number of proactive steps that can be taken to avoid a preventable discharge:
Secure and protect equipment:
- Ensure discharge outlets are capped and protected
- Use caps rated above the working pressure of the container
- Keep components positioned away from pressure relief devicesMaintain systems properly:
- Remove actuators from valves before conducting maintenance
- Inspect systems regularly for leaks, wear, or damage
- Address faults promptly and record corrective actions
Improve awareness on site: - Brief personnel and contractors on suppression systems before work begins
- Keep actuation cables secure and out of the way
- Reduce trip and snag hazards, particularly in confined or high-traffic areas
These measures are particularly important in complex environments where multiple activities are taking place at the same time.
How can you report a discharge?
If a discharge occurs, the Board encourages:
- Reporting it as soon as possible to the Board via the email address: [email protected] or via the Permit Holder Portal and App.
- Recording what happened and any contributing factors
- Outlining the measures in place from preventing a future discharge
- A full discharge report form can be found here.
Ultimately, consistent reporting further supports better decision-making, more targeted guidance, and ongoing improvement across the industry. When combined with practical prevention measures, it helps build a clearer understanding of risk and supports safer, more reliable operation of gaseous fire suppression systems.
The importance of reporting & preventing discharges in the marine industry
To stay safe from fire at sea the marine industry often requires the use of fire suppression systems, which contain scheduled extinguishing agents such as Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) and Synthetic Greenhouse Gases (SGGs). ODS & SGGs are damaging to the ozone layer and contribute to global warming. Common agents used on vessels are Halon, FM-200 and NAF S-III.
A common cause of preventable discharges in this industry is human error. A recent discharge case reported to the Board involved a technician who slipped and tripped over while changing a system. This highlights the risks in confined spaces and the importance of spatial awareness. In another case, a loose manual actuation cable was accidentally caught on during maintenance, triggering a discharge. Ensuring cables and conduits are out of sight minimises the risk of a tripping hazard and prevents a discharge.
There a number of practical steps technicians and operators of vessels can take to help avoid preventable discharges. Best practice for avoding a preventable or human-error related discharge includes:
- Installing actuation cables to manufacturer requirements and keeping them secure and out of sight
- Ensuring cables and conduits don’t create tripping hazards
- Staying aware of surroundings in tight engine room spaces
- Informing contractors and crew about fire suppression systems on board
- Checking equipment regularly for leaks, worn valves or damaged hose lines
- Ensuring discharge outlets are capped and positioned away from pressure relief devices
- Using caps rated to at least 1.5x the container’s working pressure
- Removing actuators from container valves before maintenance
- Ensuring that the handling of scheduled extinguishing agents in any way is conducted by an appropriately licensed technician.
Why is it important to report preventable discharges to the board?
Reporting accidental discharges is important so the Board can monitor emissions of scheduled extinguishing agents that contain Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) and Synthetic Greenhouse Gases (SGGs) entering the Earth’s atmosphere. This also helps the Board to guide the industry and support best practice to prevent future incidents from occuring.
Learn more about reporting and preventing discharges at sea, here.
Why Licensed Technicians Matter for Scheduled Extinguishing Agents on Mine Sites:
Engaging appropriately licensed technicians is critical when handling scheduled extinguishing agents on mine sites. These systems are used across both underground and open-cut operations to protect high-risk areas such as heavy mobile equipment, conveyor systems, control rooms, switch rooms and power infrastructure. They are also commonly installed on large machinery including haul trucks, excavators and loaders.
Many of these systems rely on scheduled extinguishing agents such as FM-200® (HFC-227ea), FE-227™, NAF-SIII and NAF-PIII. While these agents are highly effective at suppressing fire and are safe for use around sensitive equipment, they are classified as Synthetic Greenhouse Gases (SGGs). If released into the atmosphere through leaks, poor maintenance, accidental or required discharge, they contribute to global heating. These gases often have a high Global Warming Potential (GWP), meaning even small releases can have a significant environmental impact.
The global use of SGGs, particularly hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), is now being reduced under the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol. This international agreement commits countries, including Australia, to phase down the production and consumption of HFCs over time. While these gases do not deplete the ozone layer, their high global warming potential means reducing their use is an important step in addressing climate change.
Australia has implemented this phase-down through domestic legislation, placing stricter controls on the import, manufacture and use of SGGs. For industries such as mining, this increases the importance of preventing unnecessary emissions and ensuring that existing systems are properly maintained and only handled by licensed technicians.
This is why Australian law requires that any person installing, servicing, maintaining or decommissioning systems containing scheduled extinguishing agents holds an appropriate Extinguishing Agent Handling Licence (EAHL). Businesses that buy, store or dispose of these agents must also hold an Extinguishing Agent Trading Authorisation (EATA).
Well maintained scheduled extinguishing agents are essential to ensuring reliable performance in an emergency and to reducing the risk of leaks or unintended discharge. Engaging licensed technicians helps ensure systems remain compliant, operate as intended and minimise environmental impact.
There are also financial risks to consider. Insurance claims may be denied if work has been carried out by unlicensed technicians, particularly where poor servicing contributes to system failure or discharge. This can result in significant costs, including damage to equipment, operational downtime and liability.
Mine site operators should confirm that contractors hold the appropriate licences and understand any permit requirements that apply to their work. A list of companies hiring licenced professionals is available here. This is a practical step in protecting people, safeguarding assets and reducing environmental risk.
Planning for Cleaner Fire Suppression: How the Fire Protection Industry Is Transitioning to More Sustainable Alternatives
As expectations around environmental performance continue to shift, Australia’s fire protection industry is re-examining the fire suppression agents used to protect critical and high-value environments. For many organisations, this has prompted a closer look at the fire suppression systems used to protect people, critical infrastructure and high-value environments.
In response, the fire protection industry is increasingly moving away from traditional Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas (SGGs) agents, and toward cleaner alternatives that reduce environmental impact while still meeting operational and safety requirements.
Gaseous fire suppression systems have long been used in fire suppression systems. However, some scheduled extinguishing agents historically used in these systems, including halons and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), contribute to ozone depletion and increased global heating.
Australia’s HFC phase-down, which commenced in January 2018 as part of its Montreal Protocol and Kigali Agreement obligations, progressively reduces the amount of bulk HFC gas that can be imported into the country. By 2036, imports will be capped at 15 per cent of baseline levels. This is not an immediate ban, and existing systems can continue to operate and be serviced. However, the tightening import limits make it increasingly important for businesses to plan ahead and consider lower-impact alternatives as part of long-term asset management.
Cleaner alternatives are already available. However, there is no single replacement that suits every building, environment or hazard type. So what is the most effective approach to transitioning a system to a more environmentally ‘friendlier’ version? There are a number of options and considerations for selecting an alternative based on the risk profile, occupancy requirements, asset value, and ongoing maintenance needs. Each can offer a range of benefits, including that they do not require a permit issued by the FPIB, and may help financially over the longer term.
Some of the most common alternatives include:
Inert gas systems (IG-series agents)
Inert gases suppress fire by reducing oxygen levels to the point where combustion cannot be sustained, while typically maintaining oxygen concentrations that remain safe for occupants. These agents are naturally occurring, have strong environmental credentials, and leave no residue after discharge.
A leading example is IG-541, a blend of nitrogen, argon and carbon dioxide. It is increasingly being adopted as an alternative to FM-200 due to its lower global warming potential (GWP) and strong performance in enclosed spaces. In addition to its environmental benefits, inert gas systems can offer practical operational advantages such as long hold times, maintained visibility during discharge, and reduced risk of damaging sensitive equipment.
FK-5-1-12 (fluoroketone) systems
FK-5-1-12 is a synthetic agent, but unlike HFCs and HCFCs, it is a fluoroketone. It has a low atmospheric lifetime and is considered environmentally acceptable. It is also suitable for use in occupied areas and is commonly installed in environments such as control rooms, telecommunications facilities and museums. FK-5-1-12 suppresses fire by removing heat and interrupting the combustion process, making it a useful option for asset protection where clean discharge is required.
Water mist systems
Water mist systems discharge extremely fine droplets that suppress or extinguish fire through cooling, oxygen displacement and radiant heat reduction. They are environmentally friendly and effective across a range of hazards, particularly where ongoing cooling is needed. Depending on the application, water mist systems may require full-scale fire testing and can involve higher upfront investment.
Hybrid (water mist and inert gas) systems
Hybrid systems combine inert gas and water mist by injecting nitrogen into the water stream at the nozzle. This produces very fine droplets while also reducing oxygen concentration in the protected area. Hybrid systems can be attractive for some industrial environments because they use low water volumes while providing effective suppression. As these systems are relatively new and currently do not have dedicated Australian standards, design and maintenance requirements are typically guided by manufacturer specifications.
Oxygen Reduction Fire Prevention (ORFP) systems
Rather than suppressing a fire after ignition, ORFP systems prevent fires from starting by maintaining oxygen levels below typical ignition thresholds. They can be effective in specialist settings such as archives, data centres and secure storage areas. However, they require well-sealed enclosures and ongoing operating costs need to be considered as part of lifecycle planning. ORFP systems are generally used as a prevention strategy, rather than as a direct replacement for suppression in every application.
Planning a successful transition
While the benefits of cleaner alternatives are clear, transitioning from an existing ODS or SGG system requires careful planning. The Board’s guidance highlights several opportunities across the life of a fire suppression system where changing to an alternative may be practical and cost-effective.
These include scheduled maintenance events such as ten-yearly hydrostatic testing under AS 1851, which can be expensive and may be an ideal time to consider replacement rather than reinvestment. A transition may also be considered following a system discharge, when the cost of refilling a scheduled agent prompts reassessment, or when the fire risk changes due to a facility upgrade, system extension or change in use.
In many cases, the best outcomes come from planning well in advance. A structured transition plan allows system owners to evaluate alternatives, confirm suitability for the hazard, and align upgrades with broader maintenance schedules and capital works.
When assessing alternatives, it is important to consider practical and technical factors such as:
- The hazard type and the suitability of the alternative agent
- Whether the space is occupied and whether there are any additional associated safety requirements
- The container footprint, cylinder storage needs and floor loading
- Pipe network design and pressure requirements
- Compatibility with detection, control and alarm systems
- Maintenance requirements, whole-of-life costs and running costs
- Decommissioning obligations, including safe removal and licensed handling of scheduled agents
When assessing alternative fire suppression technologies, it is important to note that the relevance and impact of each of the following points will depend on the specific system being proposed, the nature of the hazard, and the characteristics of the protected space.
Ultimately, the fire protection industry’s transition toward cleaner suppression solutions is being driven by both the HFC phase-down requirements under the Montreal Protocol and industry leadership. While the HFC phase-down does not require immediate replacement of existing systems, it reinforces the importance of forward planning and encourages a gradual shift toward lower-impact technologies.
As the range of alternatives expands and phase-down limits tighten, the most successful transitions will be those supported by strong technical design, engagement with system owners, and clear long-term planning. Cleaner fire suppression is not simply about replacing one agent with another, it is about selecting the right solution to protect people, property and the environment for years to come.
Understanding Permit Requirements for Aviation Engineers
Did you know that the permit requirements for the use of scheduled agents in the aviation industry can be different to other sectors?
This is because a large number of engineers working in the aviation industry are trained in the use of fire suppression systems containing Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) and Synthetic Greenhouse Gases (SGGs) as part of their profession.
If you are an Aircraft Maintenance Engineer (AME) or Licensed Aircraft Maintenance Engineer (LAME), the key requirement for approved handling of scheduled agents is competency in the unit: ‘CPPFES2043A – Prevent ozone depleting substance and synthetic greenhouse gas emissions’. An approved equivalent assessment can also suffice in some circumstances.
This unit ensures that engineers understand how to safely handle, recover, and manage scheduled agents in a manner that prevents unnecessary discharges. In practice, it recognises that AMEs and LAMEs already operate under strict aviation safety and licensing frameworks, while still ensuring environmental safeguards are met.
For other aviation workers, the permit requirements may change for individuals who are not AMEs or LAMEs holding this unit of competency.
Anyone in the aviation industry who is not an AME or LAME but handles scheduled ODS or SGG agents is required to hold an Extinguishing Agent Handling Licence (EAHL) and complete the relevant training. This ensures that all technicians have demonstrated the knowledge and skills required to safely handle scheduled agents and that they are meeting the conditions of their permit, as legislated in the Fire Protection Division of the Federal Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Regulations 1995 (the Regulations).
While individual AMEs and LAMEs may not need an EAHL, as highlighted in the article below, companies operating in the aviation sector still have their own obligations if possessing scheduled agents. Any organisation that is acquiring, storing and or disposing of scheduled agents must hold an Extinguishing Agent Trading Authorisation. This applies regardless of the qualifications held by individual engineers. Likewise, if halon is possessed in any capacity, such as in aircraft fire-suppression systems, the company must hold a Halon Special Permit (HSP).
In summary, a strong emphasis on due diligence and safety underpins professional practice in Australia’s aviation sector, including the use of scheduled agents. These requirements exist to ensure that aviation fire protection and environmental protection go hand in hand. Proper training, permits, and authorisations help prevent accidental releases of ODS & SGGs helping to protect the ozone layer and reduce greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global heating. Understanding who needs a permit helps aviation workers and companies stay compliant while protecting both safety and the environment.
To find a training provider and to enrol in the unit ‘CPPFES2043A – Prevent ozone depleting substance and synthetic greenhouse gas emissions’, please click here. For more information on permits, visit here.
Understanding why holding the correct permit and best practice matters in aviation fire suppression systems
Fire safety on board aircrafts is critical, and the aviation industry relies heavily on fire suppression systems containing Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) & Synthetic Greenhouse Gases (SGGs), including halon. Whilst halon has been phased-out across many industries, it continues to be approved for essential use in the aviation sector because it is one of the most effective fire suppression agents for confined spaces.
Scheduled agents are typically found in aircraft fire suppression systems protecting:
- Engines and auxiliary power units (APUs)
- Cargo and baggage compartments
- Lavatories on transport aircraft
- Electronic bays
- Wheel wells
- Bleed air ducts
Because these systems are essential to flight safety, managing them responsibly is vital and the use and possession of halon is strictly regulated.
Understanding your obligations and holding the correct permits:
For aviation companies, technicians, operators and contractors, holding the appropriate license, permit, or completed training matters. It is a legal obligation that protects both businesses and the environment. When possessing halon a company must hold a Halon Special Permit (HSP), and if this requirement is not met, serious penalties can apply.
Responsibilities of HSP holders include:
- Complying with the conditions attached to their permit.
- Operating in accordance with the procedures contained within their risk management plans upon application.
- Ensuring halon is used only where necessary to protect human life or equipment critical to the community, and where no practical alternative to halon exists.
- Ensuring that all personnel handling halon hold the appropriate EAHL.
Protecting safety, the environment and your business with best practice:
It’s important for businesses and technicians to support best practice by regularly maintaining and testing fire suppression systems and promoting awareness to contractors entering the site. Beyond compliance, adopting best practice in handling and maintaining fire suppression systems is essential to preventing avoidable discharges of scheduled agents.
Discharges of scheduled agents like halon cause unnecessary environmental harm and contribute to ozone depletion. The ozone layer protects people from harmful UV radiation that can cause skin cancer and eye damage. It also safeguards ecosystems by reducing UV damage to crops, marine life, and natural food chains. Preventing avoidable discharges helps keep this natural protection in place.
Beyond the environmental consequences, preventable discharges also come with a direct financial cost. Replacing discharged halon is expensive, and in some cases, supply can be limited, and these releases can result in unplanned expenses or operational delays to your business.
By holding the correct permit and supporting best practice, aviation professionals working with scheduled agents can help protect the safety of an aircraft and their business financially. Significantly, these efforts also help our environment by upholding efforts to restore the ozone layer.
More information can be found here. To apply for a Halon Special Permit visit here.
The Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board – Annual Report 2024 – 2025
The Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board is pleased to share its 2024–2025 Annual Report, highlighting a year of collaboration, progress, and industry engagement.
This year’s report provides insights into the administration of the Fire Protection Industry Permit Scheme, outcomes from the Field Engagement Program, data on discharge reporting, and analysis of emerging trends within the industry. It also explores the Board’s work with training facilities, stakeholder engagement initiatives, and actions taken to support compliance and the reduction of Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) and Synthetic Greenhouse Gases (SGG)’s emissions.
The report reflects the collective efforts of the Board, permit holders, and industry partners, in ensuring the safe handling of ODS and SGGs in fire suppression systems to protect both the community, ozone, and environment.
Field Engagement Impact Report – Financial Year 2024 – 2025
The Board is pleased to publish its inaugural Field Engagement Impact Report for the 2024–2025 financial year. This report provides an overview of the work undertaken by the Field Engagement Team and highlights the scope of activities delivered across Australia, including the number of Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) completed, the key findings from these checks, and the regions visited by the team.
This report demonstrates the collaborative approach taken with permit holders, and showcases how face-to-face engagement through the Field Engagement Program (FEP) has further strengthened compliance, improved understanding of responsibilities, and supported best practice across the fire protection industry. By sharing these insights, the report demonstrates the positive outcomes achieved through partnership between industry and the Board, and how this work contributes to reducing harmful Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas (SGG) emissions and protecting the environment. You can access the report here.
Field Engagement Report from August 2025:
In August 2025, 18 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed across different regions of the country.
- 17 EAHL permit holders
- 1 EATA permit holder
- 0 HSP permit holders
Broken down into states, these numbers are as follows:
- New South Wales (NSW):
- EAHL – 4
- Queensland (QLD):
- EAHL – 5
- EATA – 1
- Western Australia (WA):
- EAHL – 8
A strong number of outcomes were recorded during these PCCs. Of the 17 EAHL PCCs, only 5 of these required no further action.
For EAHL PCCs, outcomes discovered included;
- Discharge reporting education,
- Information on obtaining additional entitlements,
- Safe disposal education,
- Stickers requested,
- Training course information requested,
- Update details.
Outcomes for EATA permits:
No outcomes were recorded this reporting period for EATAs.
Non-compliance
There were no instances of non-compliance discovered during PCCs in August.
Resolved Non-compliance
There were no open investigations into non-compliance arising from PCCs in the month of August.
Discharge Reports Received
There were five discharge reports received in August. The breakdown by industry sector and total volume discharged is as follows:
The breakdown by root cause is as follows:
New Permit Holders
There were 9 new permit holders granted in August 2025, as follows:
- EAHL Qualified – 5
- EAHL Combined – 2
- EAHL Trainee – 2
58 EAHL permits were processed in total.
Four (4) permits had lapsed and have now been reactivated. The breakdown of these is:
- EAHL Qualified – 4
Field Engagement Report from July 2025:
In July 2025, 35 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed across different regions of the country.
- 34 EAHL permit holders
- 1 EATA permit holder
- 0 HSP permit holders
Broken down into states, these numbers are as follows:
- New South Wales (NSW):
- EAHL – 5
- Queensland (QLD):
- EAHL – 8
- EATA – 1
- Victoria (VIC):
- EAHL – 3
- Western Australia (WA):
- EAHL – 18
A strong number of outcomes were recorded during these PCCs. Of the 34 EAHL PCCs, only 3 of these required no further action.
For EAHL PCCs, outcomes discovered included;
- Applications for Trainee Licenses,
- Discharge reporting education,
- Information on obtaining additional entitlements,
- Safe disposal education,
- Scheduled gas information,
- Stickers requested,
- Physical EAHL card requested,
- Update details.
Outcomes for EATA permits:
- Material provided,
Minimal outcomes were recorded this reporting period as only one EATA was visited. The only outcome from this sole visit was ODS & SGG warning stickers being provided.
Non-compliance
There were no instances of non-compliance discovered during PCCs in July.
Resolved Non-compliance
There were no open investigations into non-compliance arising from PCCs in the month of July.
Discharge Reports Received
There were twelve discharge reports received in July, across the building, mining, marine and utilities sectors. The cause of these discharges were related to electrical and mechanical failure, human error, dust and environmental factors, and unknown causes.
New Permit Holders
There were 20 new permit holders granted in July 2025, as follows:
- EAHL Qualified – 8
- EAHL Combined – 1
- EAHL Experienced – 2
- EAHL Trainee – 8
- EATA – 1
81 EAHL permits were processed in total.
Fifteen (15) permits had lapsed and have now been reactivated. The breakdown of these is:
- EAHL Qualified – 6
- EAHL Experienced – 1
- EAHL Combined – 6
- EAHL Trainee – 1
- EATA – 1
FPIB’s Engagement with RTOs in 2024 – 2025
Throughout 2024 – 2025, the Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board continued its proactive collaboration with Registered Training Organisations (RTOs), ensuring robust engagement with providers on the delivery of training for current and future Extinguishing Agent Handling Licence (EAHL) permit holders. The Board’s Field Engagement Program prioritised face-to-face interactions and industry events to strengthen ties with training providers and identify any emerging issues early.
While many RTOs are authorised to deliver relevant units, due to a number of circumstances as well as variations in demand mean that not all courses are run consistently. As a result, a smaller group of providers currently deliver the majority of training outcomes that lead to EAHL licensing. These providers were engaged through site visits, conference meetings, and regular communication via email and phone. Attending conferences has also served as a key touchpoint, allowing for meaningful conversations and follow-ups that have resulted in positive developments across the sector.
The following RTOs were directly visited or engaged with by the Board over the 2024/25 period:
- Firefox Training
- Fire Industry Academy
- Axiom Compliance Learning
- Pacific Institute of Technology
- FPA Australia
- Wormald Australia
- Chubb Fire and Safety
- Paull & Warner Resources
Highlights from the year included visits to purpose-built training facilities, direct engagement with students, and discussions on training challenges across sectors. RTOs also collaborated closely with the Board to promote educational materials, distribute licensing information, and improve awareness around permit requirements.
Some RTOs operating internal-only training programs were visited to observe their technical setups and support staff in maintaining compliance. Pleasingly for the Board, this included prominent organisations within the mining sector, which strengthened connections with remote and remote and Fly-in-fly-out (FIFO) permit holders. These efforts have led to better information sharing and an increase in compliance within the mining sector.
The Board recognises the crucial role of RTOs in shaping the learning habits of the fire protection industry. These organisations serve as a primary channel through which permit holders gain an understanding of best practice, technical standards and regulatory compliance and we are grateful for the collaboration we have had thus far and look forward to it continuing in the next financial year. By fostering stronger relationships with RTOs, the Board aims to enhance training quality, ensure compliance, and support Australia’s HFC phasedown. Looking ahead to 2025 – 2026, efforts will continue to expand outreach, refine training oversight, and uphold the highest standards in fire protection across the country.
Field Engagement Report from June 2025:
In June 2025, 46 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed across different regions of the country.
- 45 EAHL permit holders
- 0 EATA permit holder
- 1 HSP permit holders
Broken down into states, these numbers are as follows:
- New South Wales (NSW):
- EAHL – 9
- HSP – 1
- Queensland (QLD):
- EAHL – 12
- Victoria (VIC):
- EAHL – 6
- Western Australia (WA):
- EAHL – 18
A strong number of outcomes were recorded during these PCCs. Of the 46 EAHL PCCs, only 10 of these required no further action.
For EAHL PCCs, outcomes discovered included; applications for Trainee Licenses, discharge reporting education, information on obtaining additional entitlements, safe disposal education, scheduled gas information, stickers requested, physical EAHL card requests, and updated details.
Minimal outcomes were recorded for this reporting period for HSP permits as only one HSP was visited. The only outcome from this sole visit was further education being provided.
Non-compliance
There were no instances of non-compliance discovered during PCCs in June.
Resolved Non-compliance
Following a PCC conducted in late May, a tip-off into unlicensed activity was received and an investigation launched. The suspected non-compliance was regarding maintenance of FM-200 suppression systems without possessing a suitable EAHL. The Board was quickly able to reach out to the company in question, who then confirmed a very recent new employment of a suitably qualified EAHL permit holder. This opportunity was also used to educate the company on the rules and regulations around working with scheduled extinguishing agents. The investigation has now been closed and will only reopen if further evidence appears.
Discharge Reports Received
There were two discharge reports received in June. Both were mining related and originated from sites in Western Australia. The quantities involved were significant with 451kg and 313kg of HFC227ea (FM-200) being discharged. In both instances, the root cause was deemed to be an electrical fault with both issues being fixed prior to replacement of extinguishing agent cylinders and systems going live again. The Board is aware of the company’s intention to phase out use of FM-200 across all their sites in the future and are satisfied that this process has already commenced.
New Permit Holders
There were 12 new permit holders granted in June 2025, as follows:
- EAHL Qualified – 8
- EAHL Combined – 2
- Trainee EAHL – 2
63 EAHL permits were processed in total.
Eight (8) permits had lapsed and have now been reactivated. The breakdown of these is:
- EAHL Qualified – 5
- EAHL Combined – 3
Field Engagement Report from May 2025:
In May 2025, 82 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed across different regions of the country.
- 80 EAHL permit holders
- 2 EATA permit holder
- 0 HSP permit holders
- New South Wales (NSW):
- EAHL – 8
- EATA – 1
- Queensland (QLD):
- EAHL – 1
- Victoria (VIC):
- EAHL – 45
- EATA – 1
- Western Australia (WA):
- EAHL – 26
These numbers are reflective of the Field Team’s attention during May being focused on capturing the larger pool of license holders who had not yet completed a PCC in both Victoria and Western Australia. As always, interstate field trips often require a higher level of logistical planning to ensure they are successful in capturing as many permit holders as possible.
A strong number of outcomes were recorded during these PCCs. Of the 80 EAHL PCCs, only 18 of these required no further action.
For EAHL PCCs, outcomes discovered included; applications for additional entitlements, discharge reporting education, information on obtaining additional entitlements, safe disposal education, scheduled gas information, stickers requested, update details, requests for physical license cards, and report of unlicensed activity.
Outcomes for EATA permits included: sticker requests, discharge reporting education, and scheduled gas information.
Non-compliance
There were two instances of non-compliance discovered during PCCs in May. Both related to EAHL permit holders undertaking works outside their license class. Both were existing holders of EAHL X6 but required a combination of license classes 2 and 3 in order to remain compliant.
Resolved Non-compliance
At the time of writing, one individual has already successfully obtained the additional license entitlements required. The other permit holder has been issued with an initial 28-day notice period and provided with advice on which units they are required to undertake in order to obtain license entitlement 3. This technician has advised that they are currently in discussions with their employer as to whether they will undergo training toward this extra entitlement or sign a declaration form stating that they will no longer work with scheduled agents.
Discharge Reports Received
There was one discharge report received in May. This incident arose from the Mining sector with 88kg of HFC227ea (FM-200) discharged. This incident occurred in an unmanned switch room at a coal mine in NSW, and was due to a mechanical fault involving the manual call point being attached to the fire protection system.
New Permit Holders
There were 10 new permit holders granted in April 2025, as follows:
- EAHL Qualified – 5
- EAHL Experienced – 2
- Trainee EAHL – 2
- HSP – 1
70 EAHL permits were processed in total.
Thirteen (13) permits had lapsed and have now been reactivated. The breakdown of these is:
- EAHL Qualified – 6
- EAHL Combined – 4
- EAHL Trainee – 1
- EATA – 2
Preventing Avoidable Discharges in the Marine Sector:
Fire suppression systems are crucial for safety in the marine industry, but the use of scheduled extinguishing agents can lead to the release of harmful Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) and Synthetic Greenhouse Gases (SGGs). To mitigate these risks, the Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board emphasises the importance of awareness among technicians, and vessel operators and owners regarding licensing and best practices to prevent avoidable discharges. This plays a critical role in protecting the Earth’s environment and ozone layer.
Vessel operators, owners and technicians can all play an important role in taking proactive steps to avoid a preventable discharge. Key recommendations to consider include:
- Regular Maintenance: Gaseous fire suppression systems should be serviced annually, while portable extinguishers require servicing every six months to ensure effectiveness and prevent discharges.
- Pressure Testing: Vessel owners should have fixed fire suppression systems and portable extinguishers pressure tested every five years to check for leaks and maintain proper function.
- Licensed Technicians: Vessel owners should be aware that the installation and maintenance of gaseous fire suppression systems must be conducted by licensed professionals.
- It is a requirement by law, that technicians must hold the appropriate licenses when handling scheduled extinguishing agents.
While it is not mandatory, the Board encourages owners to consider environmentally friendlier alternatives, such as Novec™ 2120 ore inert gases, during major servicing.
For more information on scheduled extinguishing agents in the marine sector, please refer to our factsheets.
Field Engagement Report from April 2025:
In April 2025, 50 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed across different regions of the country.
- 50 EAHL permit holders
- 0 EATA permit holder
- 0 HSP permit holders
Broken down into states, these numbers are as follows:
- New South Wales (NSW):
- EAHL – 14
- Queensland (QLD):
- EAHL – 5
- South Australia (SA):
- EAHL – 9
- Western Australia (WA):
- EAHL – 22
A strong number of outcomes were recorded during these PCCs. Of the 50 EAHL PCCs, only 14 of these required no further action.
For EAHL PCCs, outcomes discovered included; Applications for additional entitlements, discharge reporting education, education on entitlements, safe disposal education, information on alternative extinguishing agents, stickers requested, updated details, and EAHL training course information.
No EATAs or HSPs were visited during this reporting period. As most of these permit holders have now completed a permit check with the Board, visits in this category are anticipated to remain low and are largely dependant on new applicants joining the permit scheme.
Non-compliance
There were no instances of non-compliance discovered during the month of April.
Discharge Reports Received
There was one discharge report received. This incident involved 3.18 kilograms of Halon 1301 and was the result of human error.
New Permit Holders
There were 10 new permit holders granted in April 2025
- EAHL Qualified – 5
- Trainee EAHL – 4
- HSP – 1
50 EAHL permits were renewed.
Six (6) permits had lapsed and have now been reactivated. The breakdown of these is:
- EAHL Qualified – 4
- EAHL Combined – 1
- EAHL Trainee – 1
Field Engagement Report from March 2025:
In March 2025, 52 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed across different regions of the country, across the ACT, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria and Western Australia. Across permit types this included:
- 48 EAHL permit holders
- 4 EATA permit holder
- 0 HSP permit holders
Broken down into states, these number of PCC’s conducted are as follows:
- Australian Capital Territory (ACT):
- EATA – 1
- New South Wales (NSW):
- EAHL – 11
- Queensland (QLD):
- EAHL – 5
- EATA – 1
- South Australia (SA):
- EAHL – 17
- EATA – 1
- Victoria (VIC):
- EAHL – 1
- Western Australia (WA):
- EAHL – 14
- EATA – 1
A strong number of outcomes were recorded during these PCCs. Of the 48 EAHL PCCs, only 12 of these required no further action.
For EAHL PCCs, outcomes discovered included, applications for additional entitlements, discharge reporting education, information on penalties and infringements, safe disposal education, scheduled gas information, stickers requested and updated details.
Outcomes for EATA permits included stickers requests, minimal outcomes were recorded this reporting period which was likely due to the relatively low number of EATAs visited. Of the 4 EATA PCCs completed in March, 2 required no further action.
Non-compliance
There was one instance of non-compliance discovered during an EATA PCC in March. This was related to a Risk Management Plan not being readily available on site.
Resolved Non-compliance
Following the discovery of a Risk Management Plan non-compliance against the EATA holder, it was quickly resolved by the permit holder with evidence provided to the Field Officer involved.
Discharge Reports Received
There were five discharge reports received in March. Of these five incidents, four were from the mining sector and one from the building industry. Incidents from the mining sector ranged from 48.5 to 227 kilograms of HFC227ea (FM-200). The building incident involved a considerable 257 kilograms of HFC227ea due to an actual fire event.
New Permit Holders
There were 9 new permit holders granted in March 2025
- EAHL – 8
- Trainee EAHL – 1
- EATA – 0
38 EAHL permits were renewed.
Ten (10) permits had lapsed and have now been reactivated. These are all EAHLs.
Avoiding Accidental Discharge in the Aviation Industry:
The aviation industry relies heavily on scheduled gases to ensure safety. Critical areas of an aircraft, such as lavatories, wheel wells, bleed air ducts, and cargo compartments, are all equipped with fixed fire detection and extinguishing systems.
One notable gas utilised in this sector is Halon. While it has been banned in other industries due to its significant ozone-depleting potential, halon remains permitted in aviation because of the unique space constraints of aircraft and its rapid effectiveness in extinguishing fires.
Halons are particularly effective as they disrupt the chemical chain reaction that sustains a fire. In Australia, the use of halon in aviation is regulated under the Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Act 1989 and the associated regulations from 1995. There are two primary types of Halon used in the industry: Halon 1301, which acts as a total flooding agent and Halon 1211, used as a streaming agent.
So what should technicians keep in mind to minimise the risk of an accidental discharge of scheduled gas in aviation? To adhere to regulations and minimise emissions, the Board advises the following actions for technicians in the aviation sector:
- Technicians handling scheduled extinguishing agents must hold the appropriate licenses, authorisations, or permits.
- Aviation site operators utilising gaseous fire suppression systems with scheduled extinguishing agents should employ licensed technicians for installation and maintenance.
- Regular servicing and maintenance of gaseous fire suppression systems are crucial for ensuring their effectiveness during fire emergencies.
- Licensed Aircraft Maintenance Engineers (LAMEs) and Aircraft Maintenance Engineers (AMEs) involved with scheduled extinguishing agents must complete the unit CPPFES2043A or an equivalent assessment to verify their competency.
For more information on scheduled gases in the aviation sector, click here.
Field Engagement Report from February 2025:
In February 2025, 34 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed.
- 26 EAHL permit holders
- 5 EATA permit holder
- 3 HSP permit holders
Broken down into states, these numbers are as follows:
- Australian Capital Territory (ACT): EATA – 1, HSP – 1
- New South Wales (NSW): EAHL – 11, EATA – 2
- Queensland (QLD): EAHL – 15, EATA – 2, HSP – 2
- Victoria (VIC): EAHL – 1
A strong number of outcomes were recorded during these PCCs. Of the 27 EAHL PCCs, only 14 of these required no further action.
For EAHL PCCs, outcomes discovered included: applications for additional entitlements, an application for an Extinguishing Agent Trading Authorisation (EATA), discharge reporting education, safe disposal education, scheduled gas information, a request for stickers and updated details.
Outcomes for EATA permits included: discharge reporting education, information on penalties, stickers requested and updated details. Of the 5 EATA PCCs completed in February, only 2 required no further action.
Outcomes for HSP PCCs included: discharge reporting education, record keeping education, surrendered agent information and update details. Of 3 HSP PCCs conducted, 1 required no further action.
Non-compliance
There was one instance of non-compliance discovered during a EATA PCC in February, this involved Quarterly Usage Reports not being submitted.
Resolved Non-compliance
Following the Quarterly Usage Reports non-compliance discovered against the EATA holder, it was quickly resolved by the permit holder.
Discharge Reports Received
There were three discharge reports received in February. Of these three incidents, two were in from the mining sector and one from aviation. The two incidents from the mining sector involved 50+ kilograms of HFC227ea (FM-200) and the aviation incident involved one single kilo of Halon 1301.
New Permit Holders
There was 20 new permit holders granted in February 2025
- EAHL – 13
- Trainee EAHL – 5
- EATA – 2
42 EAHL permits were renewed.
Seven (7) permits had lapsed and have now been re-activated, two (2) of these being EATAs and five (5) being EAHLs.
Ensuring you hold the correct licence: Your requirements as a trainee or employer in the fire protection sector
If you’re stepping into the fire protection industry and intend on working in the realm of scheduled extinguishing agents, obtaining your Extinguishing Agent Handling Licence (EAHL) is essential for anyone handling these materials. This crucial permit is mandatory for activities such as:
- Decanting extinguishing agents,
- Servicing fire protection systems—including gaseous fire suppression and portable extinguishers,
- Decommissioning or disposing of equipment containing scheduled substances.
For trainees, securing your EAHL not only fulfills your legal obligations but also enhances fire safety standards, protects the environment, and supports Australia’s commitments under the Montreal Protocol on ozone depletion.
Employers, if you’re intending on hiring or working with trainees, please be aware that anyone in your workforce dealing with these agents must possess an EAHL to comply with the Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Act & Regulations. Understanding these requirements is key to fostering a responsible and compliant workplace.
For further details on obtaining an EAHL, please visit our webpage on licence types.
Attention Mining Industry: The Importance of Reporting ODS & SGG Discharges
The mining industry plays a vital role in safeguarding the environment by ensuring all emissions, particularly those of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) and synthetic greenhouse gases (SGG), are reported, recorded, and minimised. These gases, commonly found in fire suppression systems, can significantly impact the ozone layer and contribute to climate change if not properly managed.
Why Reporting Matters
Reporting the discharge of ODS and SGG extinguishing agents is essential for several reasons:
- Tracking and Reducing Emissions– By documenting and monitoring discharges, the industry can better understand emission trends and implement effective reduction strategies.
- Supporting Sustainable Fire Protection Practices– Encouraging responsible use of fire suppression systems ensures long-term environmental sustainability.
Who Should Report?
The Board recommends that it is the responsibility of the Extinguishing Agent Handling Licence (EAHL) holder engaged by the service provider to report any discharge of ODS and SGG extinguishing agents. However, the Board strongly encourages any individual aware of a discharge incident to take action and make a report.
How to Report a Discharge
If a discharge occurs, it should be reported immediately to the Board. This proactive approach helps protect our environment and ensures compliance with regulatory requirements.
Reports can be submitted via:
- The Licence Holder Portal
- Our website: https://lnkd.in/gZV-r485
A Collective Effort for a Sustainable Future
Environmental protection is a shared responsibility. By reporting ODS and SGG discharges, the mining industry can play a crucial role in reducing harmful emissions and contributing to a more sustainable future. Let’s work together to safeguard our planet for generations to come.
Field Engagement Report January 2025
In January 2025, 16 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed.
- 15 EAHL permit holders
- 1 EATA permit holder
- 0 HSP permit holders
Broken down into states, these numbers are as follows:
- New South Wales (NSW) – EAHL – 2
- Queensland (QLD) – EAHL – 1
- Victoria (VIC) – EAHL – 12, EATA – 1
Despite January beinga relatively quiet month, a number of outcomes have been recorded during these PCCs.
For EAHL PCCs, outcomes range from applications for additional entitlements, discharge reporting education, safe disposal
education, physical card requested, scheduled gas information, update details, but the most common outcome in January was stickers requested.
Outcomes for EATA permits were one each for Trainee application requested for new trainees coming up, scheduled gas information, and stickers requested.
Non-compliance
There have been NO permit holders found to be non-compliant in January.
Resolved Non-compliance
In January, there have been two (2) non-compliance resolved.
- Undertaking work outside licence class (EAHL – 1)
- Expired permit (EAHL – 1)
Discharge Reports Received
There were NO discharge reports received in January, as a direct result of a Permit Condition Check being conducted.
New Permit Holders
There have been 14 new permit holders in January 2025 (EAHL – 11).
One (1) of these is a Trainee EAHL permit.
45 EAHL permits have been renewed, 2 EATA permits have been renewed.
19 EAHL permits had lapsed and have now been re-activated.
Field Engagement Report December 2024
In December 2024, 7 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed.
- 7 EAHL permit holders
- 0 EATA permit holders
- 0 HSP permit holders
Broken down into states, these numbers are as follows:
- New South Wales (NSW) – EAHL – 5
- Queensland (QLD) – EAHL – 2
As this was a very quiet month, only a few outcomes have been recorded during these PCCs. For 3/7 permit holders, there has been no further action required.
Other outcomes range applications for additional entitlements, stickers requested, safe disposal education, physical card requested, and one report of unlicenced activity.
Non-compliance
There have been NO permit holders found to be non-compliant in December.
Resolved Non-compliance
In December, there has been NO non-compliance resolved.
Discharge Reports Received
There were NO discharge reports received in December, as a direct result of a Permit Condition Check being conducted.
New Permit Holders
There have been 13 new permit holders in December 2024 (EAHL – 11, EATA – 1, HSP – 1).
One (1) of these is a Trainee EAHL permit.
39 EAHL permits have been renewed, 1 EATA permit has been renewed, 1 HSP permit has been renewed.
14 EAHL permits had lapsed and have now been re-activated.
Field Engagement Report November 2024
In November 2024, 97 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed.
- 90 EAHL permit holders
- 2 EATA permit holder
- 5 HSP permit holders
Broken down into states, these numbers are as follows:
- New South Wales (NSW) – EAHL – 19
- Queensland (QLD) – EAHL – 8, EATA – 1, HSP – 2
- Victoria (VIC) – EAHL – 10, HSP – 1
- Western Australia (WA) – EAHL – 53, EATA – 1, HSP – 2
Many outcomes have been uncovered during these PCCs. For 19/97 permit holders, there has been no further action required. Discharge Reporting Education, as always, has been one of the most prevalent outcomes, with 36/97 permit holders receiving some education on how, when and why to report discharges. ‘Stickers Requested’ has once again been a recurring outcome, with 34/50 permit holders requesting stickers for cylinders or panels, and ‘Updated details’ was another frequent and welcome outcome, with 20/97 permit holders updating their details in our system.
Other outcomes range from simple education required, to non-compliance which needs to be rectified by the permit holder.
Non-compliance
There have been 5 permit holders found to be non-compliant in November.
3 EAHL permit holders were undertaking works outside their EAHL entitlement class.
2 EAHL permit holder were working with an expired licence.
Resolved Non-compliance
In November, there has been two (2) non-compliance resolved, one (1) was for an expired EAHL permit, and one (1) for EATA – Quarterly Reports not submitted.
Discharge Reports Received
There were five (5) discharge reports received in November, as a direct result of a Permit Condition Check being conducted.
New Permit Holders
There have been 14 new permit holders in November 2024 (EAHL – 13, HSP – 1).
Two (2) of these are Trainee EAHL permits.
24 EAHL permits have been renewed, 2 EATA permits have been renewed, 3 HSP permits have been renewed, 1 SCE permit has been renewed.
16 EAHL and 1 HSP permits had lapsed and have now been re-activated.
Field Engagement Report October 2024
In October 2024, 50 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed.
- 44 EAHL permit holders
- 1 EATA permit holder
- 4 HSP permit holders
Broken down into states, these numbers are as follows:
- Australian Capital Territory (ACT) – EATA – 1, HSP – 1,
- New South Wales (NSW) – EAHL – 22, HSP – 2
- Northern Territory (NT) – EAHL – 4, HSP – 1
- Queensland (QLD) – EAHL – 9
- Victoria (VIC) – EAHL – 7
- Western Australia (WA) – EAHL – 2
Many outcomes have been uncovered during these PCCs. For 19/50 permit holders, there has been no further action required. Discharge Reporting Education, as always, has been one of the most prevalent outcomes, with 13/50 permit holders receiving some education on how, when and why to report discharges. ‘Stickers Requested’ has once again been a recurring outcome, with 10/50 permit holders requesting stickers for cylinders or panels, and ‘Updated details’ was another frequent and welcome outcome, with 14/50 permit holders updating their details in our system.
Other outcomes range from simple education required, to non-compliance which needs to be rectified by the permit holder.
Non-compliance
There have been 3 permit holders found to be non-compliant.
1 EAHL permit holder was undertaking works outside their EAHL entitlement class.
2 EAHL permit holder was working with an expired licence.
Resolved Non-compliance
In September, there has been six (6) non-compliance resolved, four (4) were for undertaking works outside EAHL licence type, one (1) for an expired EAHL permit, amd one (1) for EATA – Quarterly Reports not submitted.
Discharge Reports Received
There were three (3) discharge reports received in October, as a direct result of a Permit Condition Check being conducted.
New Permit Holders
There have been 13 new permit holders in October 2024 (EAHL – 12, HSP – 1).
Four (4) of these are Trainee EAHL permits.
20 EAHL permits have been renewed, 2 EATA permits have been renewed, 3 HSP permits have been renewed.
9 EAHL and 1 EATA permits had lapsed and have now been re-activated.
Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board 2023 – 2024 Annual Report
The Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board are pleased to share the 2023 – 2024 Annual Report. This Annual Report provides a comprehensive overview of the key achievements and advancements achieved by the Board in the past year and highlights the Board’s commitment to fostering compliance and best practice in the handling of ozone depleting scheduled gases in the fire protection industry through innovation, education, and collaboration within the industry.
You can access the 2023 – 2024 Annual Report here.
Field Engagement Report September 2024
In September 2024, 91 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed.
- 88 EAHL permit holders
- 1 EATA permit holder
- 2 HSP permit holders
Broken down into states, these numbers are as follows:
- New South Wales (NSW) – EAHL – 16
- Queensland (QLD) – EAHL – 16
- South Australia (SA) – EAHL – 32, HSP – 2
- Tasmania (TAS) – EAHL – 12
- Victoria (VIC) – EAHL – 12, EATA – 1
Many outcomes have been uncovered during these PCCs. For 18/91 permit holders, there has been no further action required. Discharge Reporting Education, as always, has been one of the most prevalent outcomes, with 47/91 permit holders receiving some education on how, when and why to report discharges. ‘Stickers Requested’ has once again been a recurring outcome, with 22/91 permit holders requesting stickers for cylinders or panels, and ‘Updated details’ was another frequent and welcome outcome, with 21/91 permit holders updating their details in our system.
Other outcomes range from simple education required, to non-compliance which needs to be rectified by the permit holder.
Non-compliance
There have been 6 permit holders found to be non-compliant.
3 EAHL permit holders were undertaking works outside their EAHL entitlement class.
2 EAHL permit holder was working with an expired licence.
1 EATA permit holder was not up to date with submitting their Quarterly Usage Reports.
Resolved Non-compliance
In September, there has been three (3) non-compliance resolved, two (2) were for undertaking works outside EAHL licence type, one (1) for an expired EAHL permit.
Discharge Reports Received
In September there was one (1) discharge report received in September, as a direct result of a Permit Condition Check being conducted.
New Permit Holders
There have been 7 new permit holders in August 2024 (EAHL – 5, HSP – 1).
2 of these are Trainee EAHL permits.
24 EAHL permits have been renewed, and 14 EAHL permits had lapsed and have now been re-activated.
Scheduled Gases Used in the Marine Industry
30 September 2024
Safety is paramount in the Australian maritime sector, and one critical aspect is fire suppression safety. As many people within the Australian maritime sector know, the marine industry is exposed to various fire hazards, ranging from engine room mishaps, galley accidents and more. Vessels that can be affected by fire range from leisure craft through to fishing boats, work boats, tugs and tenders to ferries, roll on-roll off ships, offshore supply vessels, cruise ships, bulk carriers, tankers, LNG carriers, container ships and warships. Significantly, whether in domestic or international waters, all forms of vessels can be prone to fire danger so it’s important to take precautions and safety at sea seriously.
So, what is the best way to stay safe on the water and where you should you look to make sure you’re adhering to applicable fire safety laws and regulations? One such place for advice is the
Fire Protection Industry Board (FPIB). Acting on behalf of the Federal Government’s Department of Climate Change, Energy, Environment and Water (DCCEEW), the FPIB plays a pivotal role in setting guidelines and recommendations to ensure that the maritime industry adheres to the highest standards of fire safety. Additionally, in line with global environmental initiatives, the Board administers the fire protection division of the Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Regulations 1995 (the Regulations) on behalf of the Australian Government, managing the permit and licensing systems of individuals, workers and businesses who handle scheduled extinguishing agents for fire protection.
To mitigate the risks of fire on board vessels, the FPIB has developed comprehensive guidelines for fire suppression systems on ships, whilst working to ensure all fire suppression agents adhere to environmental regulations set by the Federal Government. Primarily the most commonly used scheduled extinguishing agents used within the maritime sector are: FM-200®, FE-227™ and NAF S-III because of their ability to act as leading alternatives to Halon. Notably, for maritime workers, working within domestic waters each of these agents must be obtained from companies who hold an EATA (Extinguishing Agent Trading Authorisation), a permit which is issued by the FPIB. FM-200® can protect from most of the hazards that halon does but is significantly less toxic. Halon was banned from being imported into Australia or used on commercial flagged vessels in 1993 as agents controlled under the Montreal Protocol. This is because the ozone depleting potential (ODP) and global warming potential (GWP) of halon is far higher than carbon dioxide (CO2). Notably, Halon also has an ODP of 10 (meaning that it is 10 times more potent in destroying the atmosphere) and a GWP of 6200 (meaning that it is 6200 times as potent as CO2 in warming the atmosphere).
For Australian workers or Australian owned companies working internationally within the fire safety space, it is worth noting that any fire systems you have in place on your ships must be in accordance with International Maritime Organisation (IMO) requirements. In international waters, halon systems are still permitted. For anyone working within this international context halon can be purchased from the National Halon Bank or companies which hold a Halon Special Permit (HSP) and an Extinguishing Agent Trading Authorisation (EATA). For international workers access to supplies of halon is limited and minimum quantities will only be provided for recharging gaseous fire suppression systems to ensure safe operation.
So what are the Board’s suggestions for keeping you, your crew and your vessel safe and protected from fire? Firstly, the Board recommends that builders, operators, and owners of vessels with gaseous fire suppression systems containing scheduled extinguishing agents ensure that the installation and maintenance of these systems is done by licensed technicians. Regular maintenance and service of gaseous fire suppressions should be conducted frequently to ensure full functionality in the event of a fire and all technicians working with scheduled extinguishing agents must hold the appropriate licence, authorisation or permit. The value and effectiveness of marine gaseous fire suppression systems requires that they be properly designed, installed, commissioned, and maintained effectively. Put simply, if you don’t get these elements right your fire protection system is more likely to fail when you need it. Taking these steps will also help ensure your acting in compliance within relevant Government acts and legislations, and whilst there is no requirement to replace systems, owners should consider changing systems to environmentally friendly alternatives where possible. There are a number of extinguishing agents that are not regulated under the government. For example, owners may wish to consider systems which use Novec™ 1230, inert gas or condensed aerosols.
For both international and domestic shipping, not only is following the recommendations outlined by the Fire Protection Industry Board an important way of keeping yourself, your vessel, and crew members safe, but staying compliant with the relevant regulations is critical in helping international duties and obligations in reducing ODS’s and Synthetic SGG’s under the Montreal Protocol. The environment is protected by strictly controlling the discharge of scheduled extinguishing agents (other than for putting out fires) and regulations govern the acquisition, possession, handling, storage and disposal of scheduled extinguishing agents, particularly when used within Australian waters.
So what is the Montreal Protocol and what does it have to do with extinguishing agents? The Montreal Protocol is an international treaty adopted in 1987, which aims to protect the ozone layer by phasing out the production and consumption of ODS’s. While the primary focus has been on substances like chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and halons, recent attention has also moved towards synthetic greenhouse gases (SGGs) due to their impact on climate change. Compounds within the scheduled gases used within many fire suppression systems and extinguishing agents, when exposed to intense UV light in the stratosphere, release chlorine and bromine. These atoms when in the stratosphere destroy ozone molecules, which contributes to creating larger holes in the stratosphere. Stopping the release of these gases from entering the atmosphere and creating damaging holes in the earth’s Ozone layer is crucial in helping avert environmental disaster. Essentially, A depleting ozone layer results in an increase of UV radiation passing through the stratosphere. Increased UV radiation leads to poor human health, especially increased skin cancer, and has potential dire consequences to the rest of the environment.
Ultimately, environmental responsibility and care using fire suppression systems and extinguishing agents in the maritime sector goes beyond regulatory compliance. It is a moral imperative and the shipping industry, and in particular cargo and freight, is a significant contributor to domestic and global trade, that must also bear the responsibility of minimising its environmental footprint. By adopting fire suppression systems where possible that don’t rely on ODS or SGGs, or preventing entirely the required use of an extinguishing agent, the industry can demonstrate a commitment to sustainable practices, safety and help meet the targets of the Montreal Protocol. It is crucial that all those working within shipping work collectively to meet this targets and lead by example for the global community. The maritime sector’s contribution to these efforts involves proper maintenance and disposal of existing systems containing ODS’s and SGG’s. By integrating both safety and sustainability measures, through the acquisition of the appropriate license, training and maintenance, the maritime sector can navigate the challenges ahead while leaving a positive impact on both industry and the environment.
National Halon Collection Continues in 2024
Did you know: One kilogram of halon can destroy 50 tonnes of ozone?
The Fire Protection Industry Board (FPIB) is reminding anyone who currently possesses Halon the National Halon Bank (NHB) continues to be in operation for collection and safe handling.
As a highly dangerous chemical with extreme Ozone Depleting Potential (ODP), the Board asks for any person possessing a fire extinguisher containing Halon to surrender this item to their local halon collection point, EATA holding companies, which can be found here, or local fire station.
The FPIB is also asking once again for fire stations around Australia to help prevent the accidental discharge of this environmentally damaging chemical by accepting these extinguishers should you be presented with one.
Once accepted, the fire station should place the extinguisher in a safe and secure place and then contact the National Halon Bank (NHB) to organise a pick-up.
Should you have any queries, the NHB operates a free call service to advise on disposal of halon and also operates a free service for the general public and small businesses to dispose of halon.
Call the NHB on 1800 658 084 to arrange free collection and disposal, or for any questions.
For more information, click the link below.
https://www.fpib.com.au/education/halon-campaign/
Field Engagement Report August 2024
In August 2024, 86 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed.
- 79 EAHL permit holders
- 7 EATA permit holders
- 0 HSP permit holders
Broken down into states, these numbers are as follows:
- New South Wales (NSW) – EAHL – 19
- Queensand (QLD) – EAHL – 35, EATA – 2
- South Australia (SA) – EAHL – 15, EATA – 2
- Victoria (VIC) – EAHL – 10
Many outcomes have been uncovered during these PCCs. For 23/86 permit holders, there has been no further action required. Discharge Reporting Education, as always, has been one of the most prevalent outcome, with 23/86 permit holders receiving some education on how, when and why to report discharges. Inerestingly the outcome that has tracked the most this month was Stickers Requested, with 28/86 permit holders requesting stickers for cylinders or panels.
Outcomes range from simple education required, to non-compliance which needs to be rectified by the permit holder.
There were no HSP PCCs completed in August.
Non-compliance
There have been 6 permit holders found to be non-compliant.
4 EAHL permit holders were undertaking works outside their EAHL entitlement class.
1 EAHL permit holder was working with an expired licence.
1 EATA permit holder was not up to date with submitting their Quarterly Usage Reports.
New Permit Holders
There have been 12 new permit holders in August 2024 (EAHL – 12, EATA – 1).
2 of these are Trainee EAHL permits.
18 EAHL permits have been renewed, and 4 EAHL permits had lapsed and have now been re-activated.
Field Engagement Report July 2024
The FPIB Field Engagement team continued its work out in the field throughout July, engaging with permit holders across the country.
In total, 92 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed. This included:
- 89 EAHL permit holders
- 3 EATA permit holders
- 0 HSP permit holders
Broken down into states and permit types, these numbers are as follows:
- New South Wales (NSW) – EAHL – 14, EATA – 1
- Queensand (QLD) – EAHL 27, EATA – 2
- South Australia (SA) – EAHL 22
- Victoria (VIC) – EAHL – 10
- Western Australia (WA) EAHL – 16
Many outcomes have been uncovered during the PCCs for July. For 20/92 permit holders, there has been no further action required. permit condition checks, there has been no further action required. Discharge Reporting Education, continues as always, to be the most prevalent outcome, with 44/92 permit holders receiving some education on how, when and why to report discharges. Outcomes range from simple education required, to non-compliance which needs to be rectified by the permit holder, with the second most prevalent outcome of EAHL Permit Condition Checks’s being education on safe disposal.
Detailed outcomes by permit type can be seen in the graphs provided below:
There were no HSP PCCs completed in July.
Non-compliance
There have been 2 permit holders found to be non-compliant.
2 EAHL permit holders were undertaking works outside their EAHL entitlement class.
Resolved Non-compliance
In July, there have been two non-compliance resolved, these were both from the previous financial year. One for conducting works outside EAHL permit type (resolved by applying for Experienced EAHL 6, as the permit holder was already a licenced electrician. The second for allowing their permit to lapse and working without renewing their EAHL permit.
Discharge Reports Received
There have been two (2) discharge reports received in July, as a direct result of a Permit Condition Check being conducted.
New Permit Holders
There have been 13 new permit holders in July 2024.
6 of these are for Trainee EAHL permits.
23 EAHL permits have been renewed, and 11 EAHL permits had lapsed and have now been re-activated.
Field Engagement Report June 2024
The FPIB Field Engagement team continued its work out in the field throughout June, engaging with permit holders across the country.
In total, 106 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed. This included:
- 95 EAHL permit holders
- 9 EATA permit holders
- 2 HSP permit holders
Broken down into states and permit tpyes, these numbers are as follows:
- Australian Capital Teritory (ACT) – EAHL – 8
- New South Wales (NSW) – EAHL – 32, EATA – 2
- Queensand (QLD) – EAHL 43, EATA – 2
- Victoria (VIC) – EAHL – 12, EATA – 5, HSP – 2
Many outcomes have been uncovered during these PCCs. For 33/106 permit holders, there has been no further action required. Discharge Reporting Education, as always, has been the most prevalent outcome, with 34/106 permit holders receiving some education on how, when and why to report discharges.
Outcomes range from simple education required, to non-compliance which needs to be rectified by the permit holder.
Outcomes per permit type can be seen below in the following graphs:
Non-compliance
There have been 5 permit holders found to be non-compliant.
- 1 EAHL permit holder was undertaking works outside their EAHL entitlement class.
- 1 EAHL permit holder held the incorrect licence entitlement class.
- 1 EATA and 1 HSP permit holder had not submitted Quarterly Usage Reports.
- 1 EATA permit holder had no EAHL holder on site or the EAHL holder did not hold the appropriate licence entitlement.
As non-compliance resolution is an ongoingmatter, the graph below represents ALL non-compliance found and resolved for the year to date.
In total for the calendar year to the end of June, there have been 37 different incidents of non-compliance found, from 27 permit holders – this means that some permit holders have been found to have multiple different non-compliance present during their Permit Condition Check. The Board has followed up with all permit holders who have been found non-compliant and ensured this is being addressed.
Record fines for imports without licence
Tuesday 9 July, 2024
The Department of Climate Change, Energy, Environment, and Water (DCCEEW) have published a media release on their record fines for imports without a licence.
“The department has issued a record total of $465,480 in fines to a company for importing electrical switchgear containing synthetic greenhouse gas without a licence.
Investigators from the department and the Australian Border Force (ABF) found that the Australian arm of a multi-national company imported equipment containing sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)—the most potent synthetic greenhouse gas—without a licence.”
Click here, to read the complete media release.
Update on Penalties Amendment:
The Fire Protection Industry Board would like to inform all permit holders of an important update on upcoming amendments to the Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Amendment (2024 Measures No. 1) Regulations 2024. Starting from July 1st 2024, these amendments will see an increase of penalties for breaches, from ten to 50 units.
Additionally, civil penalties provisions will now apply to ALL offenses under the Regulations.
To avoid any penalties, stay informed, adhere to best practice when handling and managing scheduled extinguishing substances and make sure you are compliant.
For further details on the amendments and specific changes to the Regulations visit here.
Field Engagement Report May 2024
The FPIB Field Engagement team were pleased to continue to its work on the ground engaging with permit holders across the country with a large number of Permit Condition Checks conducted.
In total, 100 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed throughout May. This included:
- 90 EAHL permit holders
- 8 EATA permit holders
- 2 HSP permit holders
The number of permit condition checks broken down across states are as follows:
- New South Wales (NSW) – EAHL – 24, EATA – 4, HSP – 1
- Queensand (QLD) – EAHL 17
- Tasmania (TAS) EAHL – 20, EATA – 2
- Victoria (VIC) – EAHL – 29, EATA – 2, HSP – 1
More details on the specific outcomes from the conditions checks for each permit type can be seen via the tables below:
Many outcomes have been uncovered during these PCCs. For 32/100 permit holders, there has been no further action required. Discharge Reporting Education has been the most prevalent outcome, with 37/100 permit holders receiving some education on how, when and why to report discharges, with two discharges report received throughout this period as a direct result of a Permit Condition Check being conducted.
Other outcomes of these checks range from simple education required, to non-compliance which needs to be rectified by the permit holder.
In total, ten permit holders were found to be non-compliant throughout the checks conducted in May. This includes:
- 5 EATA permit holders who have not submitted Quarterly Usage Reports on time.
- 2 EATA permit holders who had issues around their Risk Management Plan.
- 1 EAHL permit holder who was undertaking works outside their EAHL entitlement class.
- 2 EAHL permit holders who had allowed their permit to expire and had not renewed their permit at the time of their PCC/
The FPIB Field Engagement team were very quick to address these cases of non-compliance with the permit holders and provided education on the steps needed to be taken to be compliant with the relevant act and regulations, and the crucial role they play in a creating a safer environment and workplace. The Board continues to engage and monitor all ongoing non-compliance related matters to ensure they are resolved by the relevant permit holders.
The Board continues to look forward to carrying out this work and has found these checks to be very helpful and insightful in not only being able to impart best practice knowledge on to permit holders but in also ensuring compliance.
Field Engagement Report April 2024
The FPIB Field Engagement team were pleased to expand the scope of the program in April, visiting five states in total across Australia throughout the month. The Board engaged with a number of permit holders using scheduled extinguishing substances during this period, conducting a total of 81 permit condition checks. This included:
· 58 EAHL permit holders
· 15 EATA permit holders
· 8 HSP permit holders
The number of permit condition checks broken down across states are as follows:
- New South Wales (NSW) – EAHL – 11, EATA – 4, HSP – 2
- Queensand (QLD) – EAHL 20, EATA – 4, HSP – 1
- South Australia (SA) HSP – 4
- Victoria (VIC) – EAHL – 1, EATA – 1
- Western Australia (WA) EAHL – 26, EATA – 6, HSP – 1
Only two instances of non-compliance were found throughout this period and they were:
1 EATA permit holder who had not submitted Quarterly Usage Reports on time.
1 HSP permit holder had not submitted Quarterly Usage Reports on time.
Two discharge reports were also received in April as a direct result of a permit condition check being conducted.
The Field Engagement team were very quick and happy to address these cases of non-compliance and the discharges reported with the permit holders and provided information on the steps needed to be taken to comply and best practice in fire safety and how to avoid a discharge.
More details on the specific outcomes from the condition checks for each permit type can be seen via the tables below.
The Board continue to be pleased with the progress of the Field Engagement program and are pleased to have increased the scope of the program with more states of Australia visited in April. The Board is delighted to be actively engaging with our permit holders, to interact with them, address inquiries, and provide additional education to ensure best practice and compliance. These meetings serve as an invaluable method for maintaining transparent communication between the Board and our permit holders and our focus continues to be ensuring that all parties understand their responsibilities and are knowledgeable about best practices in handling scheduled substances safely, leading to positive results for all involved.
We thank everyone who has participated in a permit condition check so far and invite permit holders to arrange one here.
Field Engagement Report March 2024
The FPIB Field Engagement team have made major inroads on engaging with permit holders using scheduled extinguishing substances throughout March. In total, 101 Permit Condition Checks (PCCs) were completed throughout the month of March, with visits made across New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland. This included 71 EAHL checks, 25 EATA checks and 5 HSP checks.
Broken down into states, the number of licences checked, are as follows:
- New South Wales (NSW): EAHL – 28, EATA – 6, HSP – 2
- Queensand (QLD): EAHL 27, EATA 12
- Victoria: EAHL – 16, EATA – 7, HSP – 3
There were many outcomes resulting from the March Permit Conditions Checks, ranging from simple education required, to non-compliance which needs to be rectified by the permit holder.
The full breakdowns of the outcomes found from the Permit Condition Checks across each licence type, EAHL, EATA and HSP can be seen in the following graphics:
The permit condition checks conducted throughout March proved to be very fruitful for the Board in connecting with permit holders and providing further education on best practice when handling, using and or managing scheduled extinguishing agents.
Overall, 9 permit holders had been found to be non-compliant through the checks conducted throughout this period. Instances of non-compliance across the licence types that were identified, included:
- 5 EAHL permit holders found to be conducting works outside the scope of their EAHL type.
- 3 EATA permit holders not submitting their Quarterly Usage Reports on time.
- 1 EATA permit holder found to not be leak testing or keeping records any leaks.
- 1 EATA permit holder had issues with their Risk Management Plan.
- 1 EATA permit holder had no equipment or had equipment that was not fit for purpose.
- 2 EATA permit holders had made intentional discharges which had not been reported.
- 2 EATA permit holders had no EAHL holder on site, or had an EAHL permit holder with the incorrect licence class.
- 1 HSP holder had not submitted Quarterly Usage Reports on time.
The FPIB Field Engagement team were very quick and happy to address these cases of non-compliance with the permit holders and provided education with these holders on the steps needed to take to be compliant with the relevant act and regulations, and the crucial role they play in a creating safer environment and workplace.
Ultimately, The Board continues to be pleased to be out in our community, meeting with permit holders to engage with them, answer questions, and further educate our permit holders. These meetings are an incredibly valuable way of keeping open the channels of communication between the Board and our permit holders and facilitating education on best practice. Ensuring all parties are across their obligations and are aware of best practice in the safe handling of scheduled substances continues to be our primary focus and has positive outcomes for everyone.
If you would like to arrange your own visit, please use our booking form, and one of our Field Engagement Officers will be in touch with you as soon as possible.
Field Engagement Report February 2024
The Board is pleased to have begun the year by successfully launching the 2024 Field Engagement Program and it has been a busy start already.
Within the first few weeks of beginning, the Field Engagement team have made 38 site-visits and permit condition checks across New South Wales, Victoria, and Queensland. When broken down into different the different permit types, this includes 34 EAHL checks, 4 EATA checks, and 0 HSP checks.
The various outcomes for each permit type included:
➔ Updating details of Permit Holders(EAHL – 6, EATA – 1)
➔ Education on discharge reporting (EAHL – 4)
➔ Education on safe disposal of scheduled gases (EAHL – 1)
➔ Stickers requested (EAHL – 4, EATA – 1)
➔ Providing information on scheduled gas (EAHL – 2)
➔ Capturing reports of unlicenced activity in the industry (5)
➔ Addressing issues of Non-Compliance – with works undertaken without a licence outside of class (EAHL – 1)
From the latest visits the Board received three reports of potential unlicensed activity for further investigation, and one individual self-reported that they were unknowingly conducting activities outside their licensing entitlements. This person is now undertaking further training to ensure they’re meeting the conditions of their licence. The most common issue our field officers are discovering is that permit holders have out of date contact details, such as work email addresses changing. If this is something that you’ve forgotten to let the Board know about, please reach out and let us know! Lastly, multiple permit holders were unsure when and how to report a discharge incident to the Board. If you are unsure, all discharges of any scheduled ODS & SGG extinguishing agents should be reported to the Board via the discharge reporting form, found here.
The Board are pleased to be out in our community, meeting with permit holders to engage with them, answer questions, and further educate our permit holders. These meetings really open the channels of communication and promote dialogue between the Board and our permit holders, as well as ensuring that our permit holders are meeting the conditions of their permit.
If you would like to arrange your own visit, please use our booking form, and one of our Field Engagement Officers will be in touch with you as soon as possible.
Field Engagement Report January 2024
In January, the Board was pleased to continue its work preparing for the 2024 Field Engagement Program, with permit condition checks to begin in February. A key part of this work was the onboarding of two new team members, Gareth Anderson and Tony Castellarin to the Field Engagement Program, as the Board’s new Field Engagement Officers.
The Board is confident that the work it has conducted throughout January has put it in good stead for a successful commencement of the Field Engagement Program and that the team is well placed to gather valuable feedback, address industry challenges, and promote continuous improvement in compliance and fire safety standards. Pleasingly, within the first month of the year, the Board’s Field Engagement team were already able to schedule permit checks throughout February across sites in Victoria, New South Wales, and Queensland.
Through collaborative efforts and knowledge sharing, the Field Engagement activities will play a crucial role in enhancing the overall resilience and efficiency of fire protection systems, whilst ensuring compliance with the Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Act 1989 (the Act) and the Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Regulations 1995 (The Regulations).
FPIB Annual Report 2022-2023
25 January, 2024
The period, covering 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2023, saw the Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board (FPIB) undertake a large scope of work across five key strategic objective areas: technology, compliance, industry engagement, discharge reporting, and training.
In the context of the large scope of work that was undertaken by the FPIB over this period, we believe we have taken strides toward achieving our ultimate goal of reducing emissions of scheduled extinguishing substances. Engaging with industry face-to-face has been high point of this financial year and one that we have seen many successes from.
Through a combination of communicating with industry stakeholders, collaborating with the department, and being guided by the IAB’s expertise where necessary, we have made valuable inroads in understanding industry trends and issues. This means we now have greater scope to plan future engagement and education activities in areas they are most required.
Access the complete FPIB Annual Report, 2022-2023 here.
Permit Fee Freeze in 2024
20 December, 2023
Permit scheme fees in 2024 will be the same as in 2023. To make sure licences are financially accessible amidst cost-of-living pressures, the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment, and Water (DCCEEW) has announced the freezing of permit fees for 2024.
Maintaining fees at their current level, sends a clear message about the government’s dedication to the permit scheme’s accessibility. By easing the financial burden associated with permit fees, DCCEEW aims to empower businesses and individuals to prioritise reducing emissions, without sacrificing economic viability
The following table shows the permit fees and durations for 2023 and 2024.
| Permit type | Duration | 2023 application fees | 2024 application fees |
| Extinguishing Agent Handling Licence – Qualified Persons |
3 years | $468 | $468 |
| Extinguishing Agent Handling Licence – Experienced Persons |
3 years | $468 | $468 |
| Extinguishing Agent Trainee Licence | 1 year | $156 | $156 |
| Extinguishing Agent Trading Authorisation | 3 years | $786 | $786 |
| Halon Special Permit | 3 years | $939 | $939 |
Site Visit Program
18 February 2023
The site visit program is expanding! The Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board (FPIB) has commenced its on-site program throughout Victoria and is now expanding to all of Australia.
The program’s aim is to increase compliance and awareness of the fire protection industry permit scheme across the board. The face-to-face visits will ensure permit conditions are being met, whilst at the same time increasing education on best practice.
We will be reaching out to our permit holders for these visits soon, in the meantime, why not brush up on what procedures should be in place to ensure compliance through our self-assessment checklists.
To find out more about site visits and what they involve, contact [email protected].
Increase to permit application fees in 2023
23 December 2022
The Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Regulations 1995 (Regulation 346) provides for the annual indexation of permit application fees.
The annual indexation formula uses the Wage Price Index (WPI) figures published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Consistent with the WPI figures for the September 2022 quarter, the fire protection industry permit application fees will increase by 3.192% per cent from 1 January 2023.
The following table shows the permit fees and durations for 2022 and 2023.
| Permit type | Duration | 2022 application fees | 2023 application fees |
| Extinguishing Agent Handling Licence – Qualified Persons |
3 years | $453 | $468 |
| Extinguishing Agent Handling Licence – Experienced Persons |
3 years | $453 | $468 |
| Extinguishing Agent Trainee Licence | 1 year | $151 | $156 |
| Extinguishing Agent Trading Authorisation | 3 years | $762 | $786 |
| Halon Special Permit | 3 years | $909 | $939 |
Emission target on track
Media release
13 October 2022
The Australian Government is on track to meet its goal of a 30% reduction in harmful emissions from ozone depleting substances (ODS) and synthetic greenhouse gases (SGG) by 2030.
To learn more about the work the Department of Climate Change, Energy, Environment and Water (DCCEEW) is doing in conjunction with the Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board to meet its target, read the full media release found here.
New laws to reduce emissions and continue healing the ozone layer
Media release
28 September 2022
The Albanese Government will today introduce a new Bill that will see stronger measures to reduce Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions and continue to play its part in helping heal the world’s ozone layer.
The Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Reform (Closing the Hole in the Ozone Layer) Bill 2022 will modernise and streamline Australia’s laws to manage ozone depleting substances and synthetic greenhouse gases.
Australia’s ozone legislation controls the import and use of ozone depleting substances and synthetic greenhouse gases—both of which are commonly used in refrigeration and air conditioning, fire protection, aerosols and insulating foam.
The control and phase-out of ozone gases stems from the highly successful Montreal Protocol – the most successful global environment treaty ever signed. To date, the Protocol is the only UN treaty ratified by every UN member state; in Australia it was ratified by the Hawke Government in 1989.
This legislation helps Australia manage the chemicals that destroy the ozone layer, which is the part of the atmosphere that insulates and protects the planet from the sun’s rays.
Some ozone depleting chemicals to be managed by the legislation are also synthetic greenhouse gases – fluorinated gases, primarily hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), which are thousands of times more potent than carbon dioxide.
HFCs make up only 2 per cent of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions but their use is growing rapidly because of increasing demand for air conditioning. Their potency means that even at 2 per cent, they have a disproportionately high impact on our climate.
The Government is working closely with industry to phase down the use of HFCs by 85% between 2018-2036. We already have in place requirements for technicians to be fully trained and to safely recover HFCs from old equipment through a world leading, industry funded and operated, product stewardship scheme.
The changes set out in the Bill to be introduced today will ensure that Australia’s management program remains efficient and effective.
You can read the full media release here.
Media Release
14 September 2022
Who’s looking after our Air?
With the pandemic sweeping across the globe just months after the catastrophic summer bushfires of 2019-2020, it is no surprise the media’s attention was diverted from a nation-wide catastrophe to one of global scale.
However, now it’s 2022, a question lingers: how are we going with our climate change efforts, specifically air quality?
The Department of Climate Change, Energy, Environment and Water (DCCEEW) monitors the ozone emissions (ozone depleting substances) caused by the air conditioning, refrigeration, and fire protection industries, and with recent insight from the 2021 State of Environment Report it is no surprise there was a spike in short-term pollution following the 2019-2020 bushfires.
Despite this setback, the DCCEEW are positive they remain on track to meet the targeted 30% emission reduction by 2030. To ensure this, they have been continuously working alongside the Fire Protection Industry Board (FPIB) to carry out strategic programs aimed at minimisation of ozone depleting substances (ODS) and synthetic greenhouse gas (SGG) discharges, as well as thorough education on handling of such substances and license regulation.
End
To read the full 2021 State of Environment Report, click here. For more information regarding license types, training and discharge reporting contact the FPIB at: [email protected]
Disposing of scheduled agents correctly to avoid ODS and SGG emissions
28 June 2022
End users should be aware that decommissioning of a fire suppression system, containing a scheduled extinguishing agent, is only to be carried out by an individual holding an extinguishing agent handling licence (EAHL).
If you or your company requires further information on the correct and safe disposal of scheduled extinguishing agents, please refer to our recent article in GasBag which covers this topic in greater detail.
Cleaner Alternatives to ODS and SGG Products
28 June 2022
Are you and your employer considering alternative options when working with clients?
The Australian Government is committed to the reduction of substances listed under the Montreal Protocol and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. There is a selection of clean alternatives to ODS and SGG products available including Inert & Synthetic gases, hybrids & Co2.To read up on more details relating to these alternatives, please refer to our latest GasBag newsletter.
Need to report a discharge of a scheduled extinguishing agent?
15 FEBRUARY 2022
The FPIB is calling on fire protection companies to come forward and report any recent discharge incident involving an ozone depleting substance (ODS) or synthetic greenhouse gas (SGG) that you are aware of. This applies to any recent emission that has taken place at your work site or an incident one of your employees may have witnessed at another site as a contractor.
Minimising the risk of discharge not only benefits our natural environment, but it also helps fire protection companies and end users to preserve their capital as scheduled agents can be costly to replace.
The discharge notification form can be found here.
Please note this form has recently been updated and can now be completed on your desktop without the hassle of having to print and scan. Simply open the weblink above, download and save to your desktop (arrow in the top right hand-corner) and then fill in the form before sending to [email protected]
If you require further information/education on discharge prevention, please refer to our flyer.
Increase to permit application fees in 2022
20 DECEMBER 2021
The Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Regulations 1995 (Regulation 346) provides for the annual indexation of permit application fees.
The annual indexation formula uses the Wage Price Index (WPI) figures published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Consistent with the WPI figures for the September 2021 quarter, the fire protection industry permit application fees will increase by 2.227% per cent from 1 January 2022.
The following table shows the permit fees and durations for 2021 and 2022.
| Permit type | Duration | 2021 application fees | 2022 application fees |
| Extinguishing Agent Handling Licence – Qualified Persons |
3 years | $444 | $453 |
| Extinguishing Agent Handling Licence – Experienced Persons |
3 years | $444 | $453 |
| Extinguishing Agent Trainee Licence | 1 year | $148 | $151 |
| Extinguishing Agent Trading Authorisation | 3 years | $744 | $762 |
| Halon Special Permit | 3 years | $888 | $909 |
